Savc\u0131l\u0131k, \u00d6SYM’den, 6 May\u0131s 2012’de yap\u0131lan s\u0131navla ilgili bilgi ve belgelerin g\u00f6nderilmesini istedi. Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi Milletvekili Atilla Kart 3 Temmuz 2012’de ‘s\u0131navda usuls\u00fczl\u00fckler yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na ve s\u0131nav sorular\u0131n\u0131n servis edildi\u011fine y\u00f6nelik’ iddialar\u0131 i\u00e7eren su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulunmu\u015ftu.<\/p>\n

\u00d6SYM a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131nda, ba\u015far\u0131l\u0131 olan baz\u0131 isimlerin kar\u0131-koca veya akraba ili\u015fkilerinin oldu\u011fu ve s\u0131nav\u0131 \u00fcst\u00fcn ba\u015far\u0131yla kazanan 4 evli \u00e7iftin cevap k\u00e2\u011f\u0131tlar\u0131ndaki t\u0131pk\u0131l\u0131k yan\u0131nda puanlar\u0131n\u0131n da birbirlerine yak\u0131n ve y\u00fcksek oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015fti. Derece yapm\u0131\u015f baz\u0131 adaylar\u0131n soru kitap\u00e7\u0131klar\u0131 \u00fczerinde hi\u00e7bir i\u015flem, yaz\u0131l\u0131 muhakeme ya da karalama yapmaks\u0131z\u0131n matematik sorular\u0131nda y\u00fczde 100 do\u011fru yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ya da yapt\u0131klar\u0131 karalamalarda ula\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131 sonucu de\u011fil farkl\u0131 \u015f\u0131kk\u0131 i\u015faretlemi\u015f oldu\u011funa dikkat \u00e7ekilmi\u015fti. \u0130ptal edilen 6 May\u0131s 2012 tarihli “Avukatl\u0131k Mesle\u011finden Adli Yarg\u0131 H\u00e2kim ve Savc\u0131 Adayl\u0131\u011f\u0131na Ge\u00e7i\u015f S\u0131nav\u0131”n\u0131 kazanan ve kar\u0131-koca s\u0131nava giren avukatlar iddialar nedeniyle zan alt\u0131nda kald\u0131. Amasya’dan s\u0131nava giren A.K. 93,5 puanla birinci, e\u015fi A.N.K. ise 93,2 puanla ikinci oldu. M.K. 89,9 ile 16’nc\u0131 e\u015fi M.K. ise 89,6 ile 17’nci oldu.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Erzurumlu avukat Fikri \u00c7\u0131rac\u0131 s\u0131navda 81,6 puan, e\u015fi Ay\u015fe \u00c7\u0131rac\u0131 ise 82,9 puan ald\u0131. S\u0131nav sorular\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nceden bildikleri iddialar\u0131n\u0131 reddeden Fikri \u00c7\u0131rac\u0131, 3,5 y\u0131l yurtd\u0131\u015f\u0131nda \u00f6zel hukuk alan\u0131nda y\u00fcksek lisans yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00fcniversitede 3 y\u0131l ders verdi\u011fini ve Erzurum’da 10 y\u0131ld\u0131r serbest avukatl\u0131k yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade ediyor. 2008’de yap\u0131lan ve 11 sorusu mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan yanl\u0131\u015f bulunarak iptal edilen avukatl\u0131ktan hakimli\u011fe ge\u00e7i\u015f s\u0131nav\u0131n\u0131 da 73 puanla kazand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 anlatan \u00c7\u0131rac\u0131 s\u00f6zlerini s\u00f6yle s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fcyor: “2008’de m\u00fclakatta elendim, dava a\u00e7t\u0131m tekrar m\u00fclakata girdim yine elendim. Son anda girdi y\u00fcksek puan ald\u0131 kazand\u0131 imaj\u0131 yanl\u0131\u015f. Daha \u00f6nceki verdi\u011fimiz dersler, bir y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma sonucu 81 puan ald\u0131m. E\u015fimle s\u0131nava ayn\u0131 kaynaklardan \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131k. B\u00fcromuz ayn\u0131, adliyeye beraber gidip geliyoruz. Bundan daha do\u011fal ne olabilir. Benim hukuk sorular\u0131nda do\u011frular\u0131m fazla genel k\u00fclt\u00fcrde az. E\u015fiminki de tam tersi. Do\u011frular\u0131m\u0131z \u00e7at\u0131\u015fm\u0131yor.” Haklar\u0131ndaki s\u0131nav\u0131 haks\u0131z kazand\u0131klar\u0131 itham\u0131n\u0131 kabul etmedi\u011fini kaydeden \u00c7\u0131rac\u0131, “Manevi tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7abilirim. \u00d6SYM’nin iptalinin i\u015flemiyle ilgili de idare mahkemesine dava a\u00e7may\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcyorum. T\u00fcrkiye’deki alan\u0131ndaki uzman profes\u00f6rler toplans\u0131n bana \u00f6zg\u00fc s\u0131nav yaps\u0131nlar, 70’in \u00fczerinde almazsam mesle\u011fi b\u0131rak\u0131r\u0131m. Bundan sonra s\u0131navlara girip bo\u015f ka\u011f\u0131t verip \u00e7\u0131kaca\u011f\u0131m. E\u015fim haz\u0131rlanmaya devam edebilir.” diye konu\u015fuyor.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\u00d6SYM Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fcn yap\u0131lan a\u00e7\u0131klamada, s\u0131navda ‘2011 y\u0131l\u0131nda ba\u015far\u0131l\u0131 olan iller ile 2012 y\u0131l\u0131nda ba\u015far\u0131l\u0131 olan iller aras\u0131nda bir uyumun s\u00f6z konusu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131’ gibi nedenlerle s\u0131nav\u0131n e\u015fde\u011fer bir s\u0131navla tekrar edilece\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131. \u00d6SYM, inceleme sonucunda somut bir delile rastlan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na vurgu yaparken, s\u0131nav g\u00fcvenli\u011fi ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131nda en k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck bir tart\u0131\u015fmaya ve \u015f\u00fcpheye yol a\u00e7acak herhangi bir duruma m\u00fcsaade edilmeyece\u011fini vurgulad\u0131. \u00d6SYM, ba\u015far\u0131l\u0131 adaylardan baz\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n kar\u0131-koca veya akraba ili\u015fkilerinin olmas\u0131 ve s\u0131nav\u0131 \u00fcst\u00fcn ba\u015far\u0131 ile kazanan 4 evli \u00e7iftin cevap k\u00e2\u011f\u0131tlar\u0131ndaki t\u0131pk\u0131l\u0131k yan\u0131nda puanlar\u0131n\u0131n da birbirlerine yak\u0131n ve y\u00fcksek olmas\u0131n\u0131 da imtihan\u0131n iptal edilmesine gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterdi.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

CHP Konya Milletvekili Atilla Kart, 3 Temmuz 2012’de ‘S\u0131navda usuls\u00fczl\u00fckler yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na ve s\u0131nav sorular\u0131n\u0131n servis edildi\u011fine y\u00f6nelik’ iddialar\u0131n\u0131 i\u00e7eren su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulunmu\u015ftu.<\/p>\n

ZAMAN<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00d6SYM taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan ve usuls\u00fczl\u00fck iddialar\u0131 \u00fczerine iptal edilen ‘Avukatlar \u0130\u00e7in Adli Yarg\u0131 Hakim ve Savc\u0131 Adayl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Yar\u0131\u015fma S\u0131nav\u0131’ ile ilgili soru\u015fturma ba\u015flatt\u0131. Savc\u0131l\u0131k, \u00d6SYM’den, 6 May\u0131s 2012’de yap\u0131lan s\u0131navla ilgili bilgi ve belgelerin g\u00f6nderilmesini istedi. Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi Milletvekili Atilla Kart 3 Temmuz 2012’de ‘s\u0131navda usuls\u00fczl\u00fckler yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na ve s\u0131nav sorular\u0131n\u0131n […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10057,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[25,20],"tags":[48,20992,46,45,47,420],"class_list":["post-10055","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-erzurum-haber","category-turkiye","tag-alexa","tag-erzurum","tag-erzurum-haber","tag-erzurum-haberleri","tag-google","tag-osymnin-iptal-ettigi-sinavla-ilgili-sorusturma-acildi"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10055","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=10055"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10055\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/10057"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=10055"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=10055"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=10055"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}