{"id":59751,"date":"2013-11-30T21:18:25","date_gmt":"2013-11-30T19:18:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.erzurumflas.com\/?p=59751"},"modified":"2013-11-30T21:18:25","modified_gmt":"2013-11-30T19:18:25","slug":"derin-tarih-ayasofya-kararnamesi-sahtedir","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/?p=59751","title":{"rendered":"Derin Tarih: Ayasofya Kararnamesi Sahtedir!"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7la al\u0131nan beldedeki en b\u00fcy\u00fck kilisenin cami yap\u0131lmas\u0131 adettendir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla \u0130stanbul, Osmanl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan fethedilince H\u0131ristiyan d\u00fcnyas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00e7ok \u00f6nemli olan Ayasofya camiye d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc. Ta ki 1934’e kadar. \u0130\u015fte o g\u00fcn \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan bir kararnameyle ibadete kapat\u0131ld\u0131. Ayasofya’n\u0131n Atat\u00fcrk’\u00fcn imzas\u0131 bulunan bir kararnameyle ibadete kapat\u0131lmas\u0131 arkas\u0131ndaki ger\u00e7ekler, \u00e7eli\u015fkiler, \u015f\u00fcpheler ve do\u011fru bilinen yanl\u0131\u015flar Derin Tarih dergisinin Aral\u0131k say\u0131s\u0131nda tek tek irdeleniyor. MHP Milletvekili ve T\u00fcrk Tarih Kurumu (TTK) eski ba\u015fkan\u0131 Yusuf Hala\u00e7o\u011flu’nun Ayasofya’n\u0131n yeniden cami olarak ibadete a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in k\u0131sa bir s\u00fcre \u00f6nce Meclis’e verdi\u011fi kanun teklifi \u00fczerine g\u00fcndeme gelen konuyla ilgili Mustafa Arma\u011fan ve Prof. Dr. Mehmet \u00c7elik’in makaleleri yer al\u0131yor. Ayr\u0131ca Yusuf Hala\u00e7o\u011flu’nun ilgin\u00e7 a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131n\u0131n yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00e7arp\u0131c\u0131 s\u00f6yle\u015fi de konuya \u0131\u015f\u0131k tutuyor.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Resm\u00ee Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanmam\u0131\u015f ki!<\/b><\/b><\/p>\n

$\"\"$ <\/p>\n

Celal Tahir’in kendisiyle yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00f6yle\u015fide Prof. Dr. Yusuf Hala\u00e7o\u011flu Ayasofya kararnamesinin sahte oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yl\u00fcyor. Hi\u00e7bir zaman belgesiz konu\u015fmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirten Hala\u00e7o\u011flu, kararnamedeki Atat\u00fcrk imzas\u0131n\u0131n bunun en \u00f6nemli kan\u0131t\u0131 oldu\u011funu anlat\u0131yor: ‘Ayasofya ile ilgili kararnamenin say\u0131s\u0131 1589. Ancak bundan iki g\u00fcn \u00f6nceki kararnamenin say\u0131s\u0131 ise 1606 say\u0131s\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yor. Bir kere say\u0131 tutmuyor. Sonra bu kararname Resm\u00ee Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanmam\u0131\u015f. Yay\u0131mlanmayan kararnamenin hi\u00e7bir ge\u00e7erlili\u011fi olmaz. \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fcs\u00fc ise Atat\u00fcrk’\u00fcn imzas\u0131. \u015e\u00f6yle ki: Kararnamenin tarihi 24 Kas\u0131m 1934. Atat\u00fcrk’\u00fcn buradaki imzas\u0131 daha \u00f6nce hi\u00e7bir yerde atmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir imza. Kemal Atat\u00fcrk yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 imzas\u0131nda ‘a’ harfini b\u00fcy\u00fck ve k\u00f6\u015feli yapm\u0131\u015flar. Oysa Atat\u00fcrk ‘a’ harfini hep k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck ve yuvarlak yazar. Biri Atat\u00fcrk’e mal edilmek \u00fczere buray\u0131 m\u00fcze yapm\u0131\u015f. Yani Ayasofya’da bir sahtekarl\u0131k yapm\u0131\u015flar.’<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Atat\u00fcrk’\u00fcn imzas\u0131 hukuken ge\u00e7ersiz<\/b><\/b><\/p>\n

$\"\"$ <\/p>\n

Kararnamede bulunan Atat\u00fcrk’\u00fcn imzas\u0131yla bir ba\u015fka ayr\u0131nt\u0131y\u0131 ise Derin Tarih’in Genel Yay\u0131n Y\u00f6netmeni Mustafa Arma\u011fan ortaya \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131yor: ’24 Kas\u0131m 1934 tarihli oldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenen Bakanlar Kurulu karar\u0131 garipliklerle doludur. Bunlardan biri de Atat\u00fcrk’\u00fcn imzas\u0131 meselesi. Gazi Mustafa Kemal, o g\u00fcn \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan 2587 nolu kanunla ‘Atat\u00fcrk’ olmu\u015ftur. Ne var ki kanunun y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmesi i\u00e7in \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcn daha ge\u00e7mesi gerekecektir. Nitekim 27 Kas\u0131m g\u00fcnk\u00fc Resm\u00ee Gazete’de ‘Bu kanun ne\u015fri tarihinden itibaren muteberdir’ yani yay\u0131n tarihinden itibaren ge\u00e7erlidir maddesiyle birlikte yay\u0131mlan\u0131r. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a bellidir ki Atat\u00fcrk, ‘Atat\u00fcrk’ ismini ve imzas\u0131n\u0131 27’sinden \u00f6nce kullanamaz. Bir ba\u015fka deyi\u015fle ay\u0131n 24’\u00fcnde Atat\u00fcrk resmen Atat\u00fcrk de\u011fildi ve bu isimle imza atmas\u0131 hem m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir, hem de att\u0131\u011f\u0131 imza hukuken ge\u00e7erli de\u011fildir. \u0130mza atm\u0131\u015fsa bile hukuken ge\u00e7ersizdir.’<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Kararnamenin orijinali ortada yok<\/b><\/b><\/p>\n

Arma\u011fan, 24 Kas\u0131m 1934 tarihli kararnamenin bug\u00fcne dek \u0131slak imzal\u0131 orijinalinin de bulunamad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dikkat \u00e7ekerek, bu belgenin olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6\u011frenmek isteyen Yusuf Hala\u00e7o\u011flu’na resm\u00ee yaz\u0131yla olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bildirildi\u011fini s\u00f6yl\u00fcyor. Kararnamenin orijinali yok ama garip bir Atat\u00fcrk imzas\u0131 bulunan ‘fotokopi’nin sahte oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yl\u00fcyor. Zira Demokrat Parti d\u00f6neminde Ayasofya talebinde bulunanlar\u0131n Atat\u00fcrk’\u00fcn imzas\u0131n\u0131n alenen taklit edildi, bu fotokopi susturucu delille bertaraf edildi\u011fini anlat\u0131yor.<\/p>\n

Peki bu belgeyi Atat\u00fcrk neden imzalamad\u0131? Mustafa Arma\u011fan kanaatine g\u00f6re Amerikan Bizans Enstit\u00fcs\u00fc’n\u00fcn m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc Thomas Whittemore’un 1931’de Florya K\u00f6\u015fk\u00fc’nde Gazi’ye ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, tarihi yap\u0131n\u0131n s\u0131va ve nak\u0131\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n alt\u0131nda kalm\u0131\u015f mozaiklerin ortaya \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 talep ettiklerini an\u0131msat\u0131yor. Mozaiklerin \u00fcst\u00fcn\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 izni al\u0131n\u0131rken, cami tozlan\u0131r gerek\u00e7esiyle ibadete kapat\u0131l\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131 da hat\u0131rlatan Arma\u011fan, ‘Kanaatime g\u00f6re Atat\u00fcrk ‘ezan form\u00fcl\u00fc’n\u00fc uygulamak istedi. Ezan i\u00e7in kanun \u00e7\u0131karamayan Mustafa Kemal’in Ayasofya’n\u0131n da Bakanlar Kurulu kararnamesiyle m\u00fczeye \u00e7evrilmesindeki hukuki mahzurlar\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne alarak ‘Hay\u0131r imzalamam’ dedi\u011fini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcyorum. Bunun her zaman kanunlara sayg\u0131l\u0131 davrand\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi bir mitos \u00e7er\u00e7evesine ta\u015f\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekmez. Atat\u00fcrk i\u00e7in sorun \u015fuydu: Birileri a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 olan bu kararnameyi iptal ettirerek Ayasofya’y\u0131 eski haline getirmeye kalkabilir, yani yeniden cami yapabilirdi.’<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

2014’te ibadete a\u00e7\u0131lacak<\/b><\/b><\/p>\n

Prof. Dr. Mehmet \u00c7elik’in konuyla ilgili makalesi de ilgin\u00e7 bir ba\u015fl\u0131k ta\u015f\u0131yor: ‘Ayasofya 2014 y\u0131l\u0131nda ibadete a\u00e7\u0131lacakt\u0131r!’ \u00c7elik, Ayasofya’n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in milletin \u015fimdiye kadar Menderes, Demirel ve \u00d6zal’a talepte bulundu\u011funu ancak konunun bir sonuca ula\u015famad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 an\u0131msatarak bu ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131zl\u0131k sembol\u00fc yap\u0131n\u0131n 2014 cumhurba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 se\u00e7imlerinden \u00f6nce Ayasofya’n\u0131n cami olarak a\u00e7\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yl\u00fcyor. \u00c7elik, Patrikhane’nin psikolojik olarak rahats\u0131z olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ancak buna \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm olarak Ayasofya’n\u0131n biti\u015fi\u011findeki Aya \u0130rini’nin kiliseye \u00e7evrilmesini \u00f6neriyor.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Derin Tarih Dergisi Aral\u0131k say\u0131s\u0131nda tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lan bir ger\u00e7e\u011fi daha masaya yat\u0131r\u0131yor. Dosya konusunu “Ayasofya Kararnamesi Sahtedir!” \u015feklinde belirleyen dergi, ortaya koydu\u011fu belgelerle Ayasofya ger\u00e7e\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131yor. K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7la al\u0131nan beldedeki en b\u00fcy\u00fck kilisenin cami yap\u0131lmas\u0131 adettendir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla \u0130stanbul, Osmanl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan fethedilince H\u0131ristiyan d\u00fcnyas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00e7ok \u00f6nemli olan Ayasofya camiye d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc. Ta ki 1934’e kadar. \u0130\u015fte […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-59751","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-kultur-sanat"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59751","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=59751"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59751\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=59751"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=59751"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=59751"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}