Giray T. ilk e\u015fini gizlice bo\u015fad\u0131, fark etmesin diye evi de ay\u0131rmad\u0131. \u0130kinci kez evlendi, bir de \u00e7ocuk sahibi oldu. Ayr\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 tesad\u00fcfen \u00f6\u011frenen ilk e\u015f dava a\u00e7t\u0131, mahkeme ‘bo\u015fanma’y\u0131 ge\u00e7ersiz sayd\u0131. Giray T.’nin \u015fu an resmi olarak iki e\u015fi var…<\/p>\n
\u0130zmir’deki ilgin\u00e7 bo\u015fanma davas\u0131nda gelinen s\u00fcre\u00e7, T\u00fcrk hukukunun da ba\u015f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00f6nd\u00fcrd\u00fc. \u0130\u015fte ‘iki resmi nikaha’ giden s\u00fcrecin \u00f6yk\u00fcs\u00fc:\u0130\u015fadam\u0131 Giray T. iddiaya g\u00f6re, 2011’de, 14 y\u0131ll\u0131k e\u015fi G\u00fczide T.’yi gizlice bo\u015fad\u0131. Emel T. ile resmi nikah k\u0131yd\u0131, bir de \u00e7ocu\u011fu oldu. Durumu anlamas\u0131n diye ilk e\u015f G\u00fczide T. ile ayn\u0131 evi payla\u015ft\u0131, yeni e\u015f Emel T. ile de evlili\u011fini s\u00fcrd\u00fcrd\u00fc.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
EV\u0130N I\u015eI\u011eINI YANIK G\u00d6R\u00dcNCE…<\/strong><\/p>\n \u0130zmir Milli E\u011fitim M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc’nde \u00f6zel kalem m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan G\u00fczide T., bir g\u00fcn kay\u0131nvalidesine ait bo\u015f evin \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n yand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6rd\u00fc. E\u015finin otomobili de binan\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcndeydi. 13 ya\u015f\u0131ndaki k\u0131z\u0131yla yukar\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kan G\u00fczide T. zili \u00e7ald\u0131, kap\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131. Endi\u015felenip polisi arad\u0131. Bir anda kap\u0131y\u0131 a\u00e7an Giray T. e\u015fini darp etti. Ne oldu\u011funu anlayamayan G\u00fczide T. \u015fikayet i\u00e7in karakola gitti.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n ‘S\u0130Z BO\u015eANMI\u015e G\u00d6R\u00dcN\u00dcYORSUNUZ’ <\/p>\n <\/p>\n HEM EMEL T. HEM G\u00dcZ\u0130DE T.<\/strong><\/p>\n HSYK \u015fikayeti yerinde bulup bo\u015fanma davas\u0131na ba\u015fka bir hakim atanmas\u0131na karar verdi. Yeni hakim bo\u015fanma davas\u0131ndaki karar\u0131 ‘ge\u00e7ersiz’ sayd\u0131. Dava silba\u015ftan ba\u015flad\u0131. Bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te ise i\u015fadam\u0131 Giray T. ikinci e\u015fi Emel T. ile evliyken, eski e\u015fi ile de evli hale geldi.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n POSTACI VE G\u00d6REVL\u0130 SU\u00c7LANIYOR <\/p>\n <\/p>\n \u0130\u00e7im rahat, bo\u015fanm\u0131\u015f biriyle evlendim <\/p>\n \u00c7ocu\u011fum ve kendi hakk\u0131m i\u00e7in <\/p>\n <\/p>\n 11.5 M\u0130LYONA TEDB\u0130R \u0130STED\u0130:\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n Avukat\u0131 arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla, e\u015fi Giray T.’nin \u00fczerine kay\u0131tl\u0131 oldu\u011funu belirtti\u011fi yakla\u015f\u0131k 10 milyon TL de\u011ferindeki gayrimenkul, 1.5 milyon TL nakit ve ta\u015f\u0131tlar\u0131n \u00fczerine, dava sonu\u00e7lan\u0131ncaya kadar ‘\u0130htiyati tedbir’ konulmas\u0131n\u0131 da istedi.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n Bana g\u00f6re evli say\u0131lmaz<\/strong><\/p>\n G\u0130RAY T.’nin avukat\u0131 Mehmet Alan ‘Normal yollarla bo\u015fanma davas\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131k. Hakim, duru\u015fmalara kat\u0131lmayan G\u00fczide T.’yi kusurlu buldu. Davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc, m\u00fcvekkilimin evli oldu\u011fu anlam\u0131na gelmez’ dedi.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n B\u00f6ylesini ne duydum ne g\u00f6rd\u00fcm Giray T. ilk e\u015fini gizlice bo\u015fad\u0131, fark etmesin diye evi de ay\u0131rmad\u0131. \u0130kinci kez evlendi, bir de \u00e7ocuk sahibi oldu. Ayr\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 tesad\u00fcfen \u00f6\u011frenen ilk e\u015f dava a\u00e7t\u0131, mahkeme ‘bo\u015fanma’y\u0131 ge\u00e7ersiz sayd\u0131. Giray T.’nin \u015fu an resmi olarak iki e\u015fi var… \u0130zmir’deki ilgin\u00e7 bo\u015fanma davas\u0131nda gelinen s\u00fcre\u00e7, T\u00fcrk hukukunun da ba\u015f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00f6nd\u00fcrd\u00fc. \u0130\u015fte ‘iki resmi nikaha’ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":7813,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7811","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-turkiye"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7811","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7811"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7811\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/7813"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7811"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7811"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7811"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\n<\/strong>G\u00fczide T., emniyette hayat\u0131n\u0131n \u015fokunu ya\u015fad\u0131. G\u00f6revli memur, ‘Bilgisayar kay\u0131tlar\u0131na g\u00f6re siz bu ki\u015fiden bo\u015fanm\u0131\u015f g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcyorsunuz. Bu ki\u015fi sizin e\u015finiz g\u00f6r\u00fcnm\u00fcyor. \u015eikayeti e\u015finiz olarak alamay\u0131z’ dedi. Gen\u00e7 kad\u0131n, solu\u011fu adliyede ald\u0131. Bo\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 b\u00f6ylece \u00f6\u011frenen G\u00fczide T., \u0130zmir 1. Aile Mahkemesi’nce verilen karara kar\u015f\u0131 hukuk m\u00fccadelesi ba\u015flatt\u0131. Avukat\u0131 arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla bo\u015fanma karar\u0131n\u0131n iptali davas\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131. Hakimi de HSYK’ya \u015fikayet edip reddi hakim talebinde bulundu.<\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>G\u00fczide T.’nin iddias\u0131na g\u00f6re, Giray T. bo\u015fanma davas\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131, tan\u0131klar\u0131 dinletti. G\u00fczide T.’nin duru\u015fmalara kat\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kay\u0131tlara ge\u00e7ti. Mahkeme de G\u00fczide T.’yi kusurlu buldu, tazminat ve nafaka ba\u011flamadan bo\u015fad\u0131. \u00c7ocu\u011fun velayeti o verildi. G\u00fczide T. ise kendisine hi\u00e7bir tebligat yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle \u015fikayet\u00e7i oldu. Soru\u015fturmay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten savc\u0131, tebligat\u0131 ula\u015ft\u0131rmakla g\u00f6revli postac\u0131 ve apartman g\u00f6revlisine ‘sahtecilik’ su\u00e7lamas\u0131yla dava a\u00e7t\u0131. Giray T. bu iki ismi organize etmekle su\u00e7lan\u0131yor.<\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>Giray T.’nin ikinci e\u015fi Emel T., ‘\u0130\u00e7im rahat. Giray T.’nin \u015fu an resmi nikahl\u0131 e\u015fi benim. Bo\u015fanma olay\u0131nda ya\u015fanan geli\u015fmeler beni ilgilendirmez. Ben bo\u015fanm\u0131\u015f olan bir ki\u015fiyle yasal bir \u015fekilde nikah yap\u0131p evlendim. E\u015fim de normal bir \u015fekilde dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015f bo\u015fanm\u0131\u015f’ dedi.<\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>KAYITLARA g\u00f6re e\u015finin ba\u015fkas\u0131yla evli g\u00f6r\u00fclmesini \u00e7ok \u00f6nemsemedi\u011fini belirten G\u00fczide T. ‘Art\u0131k onunla yeniden bir arada olmam s\u00f6z konusu bile olamaz. \u00c7ocu\u011fum ve kendi haklar\u0131m\u0131 almak i\u00e7in davan\u0131n yenilenmesini istedim’ dedi. G\u00fczide T. fazlaya ili\u015fkin haklar\u0131 sakl\u0131 kalmak kayd\u0131yla 500 bin lira manevi tazminat, ayl\u0131k 5 bin lira tedbir ve i\u015ftirak nafaka talep etti.<\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>G\u00dcZ\u0130DE T.’nin avukat\u0131 Kemal Nam\u0131k G\u00fcney, ‘Giray T. \u015fu an hem m\u00fcvekkilim, hem Emel T. ile nikahl\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcyor. Meslek hayat\u0131m boyunca b\u00f6yle bir durumla kar\u015f\u0131la\u015fmad\u0131m. Biz di\u011fer evlili\u011fin iptali konusunda giri\u015fimde bulunmad\u0131k’ dedi. Avukat Ne\u015fe Ulusu ise, ‘Bo\u015fanma konular\u0131 uzmanl\u0131k alan\u0131m. Ancak b\u00f6yle bir davay\u0131 yeni duydum. \u0130kinci e\u015fin de su\u00e7u yok. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc o, normal bo\u015fanm\u0131\u015f olan bir ki\u015fiyle evlilik yapm\u0131\u015f. Su\u00e7u tespit edilmi\u015f olsa ikinci evlilik d\u00fc\u015ferdi’ dedi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"