Yarg\u0131tay, 6 bin g\u00fcn \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan bir ki\u015finin ya\u015fl\u0131l\u0131k ayl\u0131\u011f\u0131 talebini i\u015fverenin primleri \u00f6demedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle reddeden karar\u0131 bozdu. Mahkeme, \u201cPrimi tahsil etme g\u00f6revi SGK\u2019ya ait. Primin tahsil edilememesi sigortal\u0131ya ayl\u0131k ba\u011flanmas\u0131na engel de\u011fil\u201d dedi.<\/p>\n
Emekli olacaklara yarg\u0131dan m\u00fcjde gibi bir haber geldi.\u00a0Yarg\u0131tay 21. Hukuk Dairesi<\/a>\u00a0<\/strong><\/em>yakla\u015f\u0131k 200 bin ki\u015fiyi ilgilendiren bir konuda \u00f6nemli bir karara imza att\u0131. Mahkeme,\u00a0SGK<\/a>‘n\u0131n i\u015fverenden her zaman primleri tahsil edebilece\u011finden, i\u015fverenden primlerin hen\u00fcz tahsil edilmemi\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n sigortal\u0131ya ayl\u0131k ba\u011flanmas\u0131na engel olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na h\u00fckmetti. \u0130zmir’de bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan Kar\u015f\u0131yaka 2. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi’nde a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davayla, 6 bin 74 g\u00fcn \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 oldu\u011funun tespitini istedi.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Ancak mahkeme, bu ki\u015finin\u00a0SGK<\/a>‘ya bildirilmeyen 4 bin 964 g\u00fcn sigortal\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 oldu\u011funu belirledi ve tespit karar\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay taraf\u0131ndan onand\u0131. Bunun \u00fczerine i\u015f\u00e7i,SGK<\/a>‘ya ya\u015fl\u0131l\u0131k ayl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u011flanmas\u0131 talebiyle ba\u015fvurdu.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Yerel mahkeme kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131<\/strong><\/p>\n SGK, i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan prim \u00f6denmedi\u011fi ve kurumun da tahsilat yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu nedenle 5 bin g\u00fcnl\u00fck prim \u00f6deme ko\u015fulu olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle talebi reddetti. Daha sonra \u0130zmir 8. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi’nde dava a\u00e7an i\u015f\u00e7i, Kar\u015f\u0131yaka 2. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi’nin karar\u0131n\u0131n kesinle\u015fme tarihinden itibaren ya\u015fl\u0131l\u0131k ayl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u011flanmas\u0131na karar verilmesini istedi.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Davac\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7inin temyiz ba\u015fvurusunu inceleyen\u00a0Yarg\u0131tay 21. Hukuk Dairesi<\/a>\u00a0yerel mahkemenin karar\u0131n\u0131 bozdu. Daire karar\u0131nda, 506 say\u0131l\u0131 Sosyal Sigortalar Kanunu’na g\u00f6re i\u015fverenin, i\u015f\u00e7inin hissesine d\u00fc\u015fen primi i\u015f\u00e7inin ayl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan keserek, kendisine d\u00fc\u015fen primi de ekleyip\u00a0SGK<\/a>‘ya \u00f6deme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc hat\u0131rlat\u0131ld\u0131. <\/p>\n Ayl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ba\u011flay\u0131n<\/strong><\/p>\n Davac\u0131n\u0131n ilk sigortal\u0131 i\u015fe giri\u015f tarihinin 01 May\u0131s 1979 oldu\u011fu, 31 Kas\u0131m 2006 tarihine kadar 6 bin 74 prim \u00f6deme g\u00fcn\u00fc, 29 y\u0131l 7 ay 1 g\u00fcn hizmet s\u00fcresi bulundu\u011fu ve 68 ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131 tamamlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilen kararda, \u015fu ifadeler yer ald\u0131: ”Daval\u0131 kurumun, mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesinden sonra di\u011fer \u015fartlar olu\u015fmu\u015f ise ayl\u0131k ba\u011flama i\u015flemlerini yapmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. Buna ra\u011fmen sigortal\u0131n\u0131n sorumlu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, i\u015fverenin \u00f6demekle, kurumun tahsille sorumlu oldu\u011fu prim alaca\u011f\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 davac\u0131n\u0131n ya\u015fl\u0131l\u0131k ayl\u0131\u011f\u0131 talebinin reddi usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.”<\/p>\n <\/p>\n S\u00fcper bir karar<\/strong><\/p>\n Yarg\u0131tay\u0131n karar\u0131\u00a0emekli<\/a>\u00a0dernekleri taraf\u0131ndan b\u00fcy\u00fck bir sevinle kar\u015f\u0131land\u0131. \u0130\u015f\u00e7i-Memur-Ba\u011f-Kur Emeklileri Derne\u011fi (\u0130MBED) Genel Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Hamdi \u00d6z, “Karar bir \u00e7ok ki\u015fiye ila\u00e7 olacak” dedi. T\u00fcrkiye Emekliler Derne\u011fi Genel Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Kaz\u0131m Erg\u00fcn ise karar\u0131 ‘s\u00fcper’ olarak de\u011ferlendirdi. Erg\u00fcn, “Bu i\u015fte esas su\u00e7lu prim \u00f6demeyen i\u015fverendi. Ancak hep fatura \u00e7al\u0131\u015fana \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131l\u0131yordu. Yarg\u0131tay’\u0131n karar\u0131 olduk\u00e7a sevindirici” \u015feklinde konu\u015ftu. Sosyal G\u00fcvenlik uzman\u0131\u00a0Sadettin Orhan<\/em>:\u00a0\u0130\u015fverenden tahsil edilemeyen primlerle ilgili eskiden beri sorun vard\u0131. Gerek kay\u0131td\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan, gerekse\u00a0SGK<\/a>‘ya bildirildi\u011fi halde primleri i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6demeyen sigortal\u0131lar a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan bir\u00e7ok problem ya\u015fan\u0131yordu.\u00a0SGK<\/a>, kay\u0131td\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lanlar konusunda uygulamas\u0131n\u0131 sigortal\u0131 lehine d\u00fczeltmi\u015fti. Bunlar hizmet tespit davas\u0131 a\u00e7arsa primlerini i\u015fverenden tahsil edilmese bile hizmetleri kabul ediliyordu. \u0130\u015fverenler taraf\u0131ndan bildirim yap\u0131lsa dahi primleri \u00f6denmeyenler i\u00e7in sorun devam ediyordu. Yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131 bu anlamda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar lehine \u00f6nemli bir karar.\u00a0SGK<\/a>\u00a0da bu sonra uygulamas\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6zden ge\u00e7irecektir.<\/p>\n BUG\u00dcN GAZETES\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Yarg\u0131tay, 6 bin g\u00fcn \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan bir ki\u015finin ya\u015fl\u0131l\u0131k ayl\u0131\u011f\u0131 talebini i\u015fverenin primleri \u00f6demedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle reddeden karar\u0131 bozdu. Mahkeme, \u201cPrimi tahsil etme g\u00f6revi SGK\u2019ya ait. Primin tahsil edilememesi sigortal\u0131ya ayl\u0131k ba\u011flanmas\u0131na engel de\u011fil\u201d dedi. Emekli olacaklara yarg\u0131dan m\u00fcjde gibi bir haber geldi.\u00a0Yarg\u0131tay 21. Hukuk Dairesi\u00a0yakla\u015f\u0131k 200 bin ki\u015fiyi ilgilendiren bir konuda \u00f6nemli bir karara imza att\u0131. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":8907,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[48,206,20992,46,45,47],"class_list":["post-8905","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ekonomi","tag-alexa","tag-emeklilik-piyangosu","tag-erzurum","tag-erzurum-haber","tag-erzurum-haberleri","tag-google"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8905","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=8905"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8905\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/8907"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=8905"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=8905"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.erzhaber.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=8905"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nKanun’a g\u00f6re, \u00f6denmeyen primleri i\u015fverenden tahsil etme g\u00f6revinin\u00a0SGK<\/a>‘ya ait oldu\u011funa i\u015faret edilen kararda, ”SGK i\u015fverenden her zaman primleri tahsil edebilece\u011finden i\u015fverenden primlerin hen\u00fcz tahsil edilmemi\u015f olmas\u0131 sigortal\u0131ya ayl\u0131k ba\u011flanmas\u0131na engel de\u011fildir” de\u011ferlendirmesinde bulunuldu.<\/p>\n
\nSGK uygulamas\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6zden ge\u00e7irecektir<\/strong><\/p>\n